~
This is one astrologer's take on the coming changes this year. It is from http://astrology.about.com Time of Radical Shift
A Look into the Coming Cycle
By Molly Hall, About.com Guide

Editor's Note: This article is by evolutionary astrologer Maurice Fernandez
and posted here to inspire and encourage you through the coming
changes. He specifically wrote it for a wide audience, as a message on
how to understand what's happening starting this month. (Novembr 2009)
Evolutionary astrology
looks at the chart as a guide to the soul's past lives and evolutionary
lessons for this life. Here he looks at what's evolving in the
collective, with the major alignments of the slow-moving planets. It
begins with the Saturn-Pluto square on November 15th.
Greetings,
I feel compelled to write this note about what we astrologers are
seeing coming. We are in the beginning of a very unique time in history
that will redefine the foundations of our lives. The astrological
circumstances are uncommon and very dramatic. Change is likely to
affect every level of our being, even though each person will feel it
differently and in varying degrees of intensity.
I'm writing this note so that you may make better use of this time
and understand what it is about. As astrologers we are aware of cycles
that affect our existence; because this coming cycle is very unique, I
feel it is important to share this information. I will try to keep it
simple and not burden you with a long text and excessive details.
There are multiple planetary bodies that are gradually forming a
very particular and rare alignment. This configuration began to form
during the fall of 2008. Politically, that time was when the economical
crisis exploded and when US president Barack Obama was elected.
The configuration will move into a second phase during November 2009
and January/February 2010. (Saturn will move into the Cardinal sign of
Libra and will form powerful angle to Pluto in Capricorn).
The third phase is probably the most dramatic and intense, and will
occur from the end of June to the end of July 2010, when all the
factors of the configuration will align together in a cross at the very
beginning of Cardinal signs in astrology. (Cardinal signs are the signs
of new cycles. The planets in questions are Pluto, Uranus, Saturn,
Jupiter, and Mars).these planets are slow moving bodies and therefore
it is absolutely exceptional that these slow moving bodies end up all
aligned in a cross on these very sensitive degrees!
In normal circumstances, some people go through changes while others
continue their routine. Here the alignment is so strong and dramatic
that everyone's life can be considerably affected. it is likely that
your life will not be the same by fall 2010!
The question that often arises is:" Is it bad, or is it good?" The
answer is that it depends on the way one deals with the events; a
conscious approach can make a difference.
One thing for certain: do not expect security, consistency, and
predictability during this time. Reality is bound to change fast and so
it is better to move with the flow, while remaining conscious of what
is going on. Flexibility is one of the most important assets during
this time. This influence is analogous to a gigantic wave forming.you
can ride on that wave and go farther than ever expected -experience a
powerful transformation that can elevate you to new grounds. But this
wave can also destroy a lot of what you are currently attached to.
Redefinition may occur in different fields: you may change vocation,
relationships, location, mindsets, to name but a few. New people will
move into your life, current ones may leave. New ideas and projects
will develop and you may feel inspired to completely reinvent yourself!
The cards are re-shuffled! This is a time of an awakening, a
revolution.an internal and social revolution.
Everything is shaking up. everything.from November 2009 until August
2010, nothing will stay still. It can be very good, but you have to
learn to navigate these changes and seize opportunity when it comes.
Don't try to have it all perfect, don't try to keep the cake and eat
it: change can take you to a completely new and perhaps higher level of
what you are about, but you will have to let go of your security during
this time. It is a time for risk, reinvention, new ideas, new concepts,
new vision, and the impetus to make it happen.
Marriages may break, jobs and possessions may be lost, people may
get sick, and simultaneously, new relationships may emerge, new passion
may awaken, a completely new lifestyle is in the making...You are
embarking on an adventure whether you know it or not, whether you like
it or not. My suggestion: make peace with the idea, don't resist the
adventure. If you are accepting it, you will make the best of it. If
you fight and resist it, you won't win. This is what I mean by being
open to risk taking. it may be time to take that "plunge!"
Risking does not mean giving in to every silly venture. It is about
hearing a calling for truth.things you have denied, postponed, avoided,
feared, but things you know were true. This is a time to be more
truthful and follow a calling.
Collectively, while the forces of corruption and manipulation may
attempt to control the course of events, they are bound to
disintegrate. Scandals will continue to hit the news.Natural events
will continue to shake the earth. At worst, a war may break during
summer 2010 or later because dramatic changes can spur fear and
conflict. But it does not have to go that way; we are creators of our
own destiny in the midst of the given circumstances.
As you go through these changes, it is crucial that you take good
care of your immune system because as positive as changes may be, they
can overwhelm you and weaken your immune system: eat more healthy,
avoid fast sugar, ingest raw garlic and onions daily (sandwich),
exercise, take time out of the intensity loop, do not let negativity
take over-these are basic tips that can keep you grounded.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
To achieve protection from disease causing discordant electromagnetic frequencies, you might want to try this. It has been tested by Thornton Streeter, one of the world's premier experts in the human biofield. He gives this a thumb's up - because he has the machines/labs to test it, and has tested the product. I am just providing the link; there is a video there that will not cut and paste, and you may want to watch that.
http://emf.mercola.com/sites/emf/archive/2009/12/01/Leading-Experts-Give-Advice-on-How-to-Reduce-Your-EMF-Risk.aspx
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Before you read the info below on the dangers of mammograms, please know that
there is a newer technology called "Medical Thermal Imaging" which can detect
issues in the breasts six times earlier than can mammograms, without
the risks that mammograms carry. (To learn more about medical thermal imaging:
http://www.medthermonline.com/ )
The following is from Natural News - www.naturalnews.comMammograms and Breast Cancer - Ever since the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
took a look, finally, at the scientific evidence and announced new
recommendations earlier this month for routine mammograms --
specifically that women under 50 should avoid them and women over 50
should only get them every other year -- the reactions from many women,
doctors and the mainstream media have reached the point of near
hysteria (
http://www.naturalnews.com/027558_m...). Not getting annual mammograms, some say, means countless women will receive a virtual death sentence because their breast
tumors won't be discovered.
But what is rarely discussed about mammograms is this: the tests could actually be causing many cases of breast cancer.In
fact, a new study just presented at the annual meeting of the
Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), concludes the low-dose
radiation from
annual mammography screening significantly increases breast cancer risk in women with a genetic or familial predisposition to breast cancer. This is particularly worrisome because women who are at high
risk
for breast cancer are regularly pushed to start mammograms at a younger
age -- as early as 25 -- and that means they are exposed to more
radiation from mammography earlier and for more years than women who
don't have breast cancer in their family trees.
"For women at
high risk for breast cancer, screening is very important, but a careful
approach should be taken when considering mammography for screening
young women, particularly under age 30," Marijke C. Jansen-van der
Weide, Ph.D., an epidemiologist in the Department of Epidemiology and
Radiology at University Medical Center Groningen in the Netherlands,
said in a statement to the media. "Further, repeated exposure to
low-dose radiation should be avoided."
Dr. Jansen-van der Weide and colleagues analyzed peer-reviewed, published medical
research
to investigate whether low-dose radiation exposure affects breast
cancer risk among high-risk women. Out of the six studies included in
this analysis, four looked at the effect of exposure to low-dose
radiation among breast cancer gene mutation carriers. The other two
studies traced the impact of radiation on women with a family history
of breast cancer. The researchers took the combined data from all these
research projects and then calculated odds ratios to estimate the risk
of breast cancer caused by radiation.
The results? All the
high-risk women in the study who were exposed to low-dose mammography
type radiation had an increased risk of breast cancer that was 1.5
times greater than that of high-risk women who had not been exposed to
low-dose radiation. What's more, women at high risk for breast cancer
who had been exposed to low-dose radiation before the age of 20 or who
had five or more exposures to low-dose radiation were
2.5 times more likely to develop breast cancer than high-risk women not exposed to low-dose radiation.
Bottom
line: any supposed benefit of early tumor detection using mammograms in
young women with familial or genetic predisposition to breast cancer is
offset by the potential risk of radiation-induced cancer.
"Our findings suggest that low-dose radiation increases breast cancer
risk among these young high-risk women, and a careful approach is
warranted," Dr. Jansen-van der Weide said in the press statement.
The mammogram scam exposed
Incredibly, although it is rarely reported in the
mainstream media,
the new study follows on the heels of several others that have already
sounded the warning that mammograms may cause breast cancer. For
example,
NaturalNews covered a Johns Hopkins study published earlier this year in the
Journal of the National Cancer Institute (
http://www.naturalnews.com/025560_c...)
that warned radiation exposure from annual mammograms could trigger
breast malignancies in women with a strong family history of breast
and/or ovarian cancers who have altered genes (identified as BRCA1 or
BRCA2).
And it may not be only women with a familial risk for
breast cancer who are at extra risk from mammography radiation. As
NaturalNews covered last year, a report published in the American
Medical Association's
Archives of Internal Medicine found
breast cancer rates increased significantly in four Norwegian counties
after women there began getting mammograms every two years. In fact,
the start of screening mammography programs throughout Europe has been
linked to an increased incidence of breast cancer (
http://www.naturalnews.com/024901.html).
Comments by the Health Ranger, Editor of NaturalNews.com
Mammogram
pushers now have nothing left to stand on. The complete and utter hoax
of mammography has now been wholly discredited through a flurry of
groundbreaking studies
performed by conventional medicine researchers! Yes, even the industry's own former advocates now admit mammography harms far more women than it helps.
Why? Because
mammography causes the very disease it claims to "detect".
It's much like a clever sleight-of-hand magician's trick where they
reach for your ear and suddenly produce a coin that was presumably
hidden there. But as everybody knows,
they put it there themselves!
Mammograms offer a similar kind of sleight-of-hand trick (or
sleight-of-breast, as the case may be) by actually generating the very
disease they claim to find. If so many women hadn't already been harmed
by mammography, the whole thing would be quite hysterical.
"Early detection saves lives," they say. Except they stupidly forget to tell women the other side of the story: "
Mammograms cause cancer."
And if you're gullible enough to actually irradiate your breasts every
year, don't be surprised -- shocked! -- if they someday find tumors in
them.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Feel free to pass my newsletters along to your friends! Just be sure to give credit where credit is due. :>]
Luminous Blessings,
Lois J. Wetzel
713.384.8764
www.hotpinklotus.com
"The Sky and the Stars Make Music in You." - The Hathors